🏢 公司验证🏢 Company Verification

🔍 LEI Lookup & Entity Intelligence

Search the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) database for official registration details, ownership structures, and regulatory status.

🌐 Official Registry & Regulatory Links

🧮 核心算法演示：OFAC 50% 规则并表准则 🧮 Core Algorithm: OFAC 50% Rule & Aggregation Logic

❌ 错误计算 (数学稀释) ❌ Wrong Method (Dilution)

SDN Entity X
↓ 持股 60% ↓
Intermediate Y
↓ 持股 50% ↓
Target Entity Z
▶ 测算结论：▶ Result:
Target Z 不会自动被穿透拦截 (30% < 50%) Target Z is NOT automatically blocked (30% < 50%)
备注：单一路径允许乘法计算间接持股，但严禁通过该方式规避多 SDN 间的并表聚合。 Note: Multiplication is allowed to calculate indirect ownership, but cannot be used to avoid aggregation across SDNs.

✅ OFAC 并行聚合原则 ✅ OFAC Aggregation Logic

SDN A
SDN C
↓ 52% (触发变色) ↓
↓ 51% (触发变色) ↓
Inter. B
[实控变色]
Inter. D
[实控变色]
↓ 横向并表 22% ↓
↓ 横向并表 15% ↓
Target Entity Z
▶ 核心逻辑 (Core Logic)：▶ Core Logic:
• 并表聚合 (Aggregation)：多个 SDN 对同一实体的直接/间接持股必须累加。 • Aggregation: Ownership held by multiple SDNs must be combined if they hold interests in the same entity.
• 间接穿透：并表前，每个 SDN 的间接持股需单独回溯。 • Indirect Ownership: Each SDN's ownership must be traced individually before aggregation.
• 控制权 (Control)：一票否决等控制权增加合规风险，但不自动导致拦截。 • Control: Control rights (e.g., veto) increase compliance risk, but do NOT automatically result in blocking.
判准：需同步评估并表所有权 (50% Rule) 与控制权风险。 Verdict: Assess BOTH ownership aggregation AND control risk.
\n \n \n

🕸️ 典型规避模型仿真 (仅供示意)🕸️ Evasion Pattern Simulation (Illustrative Only)

本图谱仅用于演示 OFAC 50% 规则及常见的避税/洗名规避路径。**图中涉及的实体名称与路径均为模拟示例，不代表真实所有权关系。** This graph is for illustrative purposes only, simulating the OFAC 50% rule and common evasion paths. **All entity names and relationships shown are simulated examples and do not represent actual data.**

正在加载交互式模拟引擎... Loading simulation engine...
💡 合规穿透启示：Compliance Note: 加载中...请稍候。